<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vispol Tangible and Multi-Touch Interface Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johannesluderschmidt.de/lang/en-us/vispol-tangible-and-multi-touch-interface-video/474/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johannesluderschmidt.de/lang/en-us/vispol-tangible-and-multi-touch-interface-video/474</link>
	<description>This is a blog about topics like multi-touch, Flash programming and natural user interfaces.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: johannes</title>
		<link>http://johannesluderschmidt.de/lang/en-us/vispol-tangible-and-multi-touch-interface-video/474/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johannesluderschmidt.de/?p=474#comment-165</guid>
		<description>yes, actually the lag can be recognized pretty easily. in the mean the lag produced by reacTIVision in that setup is 598 ms contrary to the mean of the lag with the multi-touch setup with the Touchlib which is &lt; 125 ms. 

from an empirical view, in the user tests the participants did not find that lag bothering. there are more serious problems about multi-touch interaction than lag. from a technical view, it would be more than nice to shrink both lags underneath 100 ms, which is the threshold for a bothering lag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, actually the lag can be recognized pretty easily. in the mean the lag produced by reacTIVision in that setup is 598 ms contrary to the mean of the lag with the multi-touch setup with the Touchlib which is < 125 ms. </p>
<p>from an empirical view, in the user tests the participants did not find that lag bothering. there are more serious problems about multi-touch interaction than lag. from a technical view, it would be more than nice to shrink both lags underneath 100 ms, which is the threshold for a bothering lag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://johannesluderschmidt.de/lang/en-us/vispol-tangible-and-multi-touch-interface-video/474/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johannesluderschmidt.de/?p=474#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Einfach genial!

Der Lag ist aber leider deutlich sichtbar - hoffentlich bekommt ihr das irgendwie in den Griff!

- chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einfach genial!</p>
<p>Der Lag ist aber leider deutlich sichtbar &#8211; hoffentlich bekommt ihr das irgendwie in den Griff!</p>
<p>- chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

